EDIT: We all make mistakes. A lot of people have gotten burned on their Bear Stearns holdings. While I merely recommended this stock as a short-term speculative buy, I do not want anyone to get the wrong idea and think that I am still recommending them. The “heat” surrounding the financials sector has died down, but I stay fast with my recommendations on LYG, SPG & AFL as the banking sector is the main bad spot here, but international banks are still out of the hot water. Best regards.
The Financials sector of the stock market is HOT HOT HOT! After the sub-prime mortgage crash all but wiped out stock value, investors seem to have found a bottom (or support for you technical guys) and values have begun to turn around. This is certainly one of the hottest areas to invest because of the oversold , undervalued companies that were normally safe refuge against volatility. Lets find some winners.
Banks – Jimvesting Picks Lloyds TSB (NYSE: LYG)
Lloyds TSB is one of the leading UK banks. As such, many investors first figured they would be hedged against the sub-prime crash in the United States. They weren’t. However, they are now insanely undervalued and should rebound strongly with the rest of the financial companies. LYG is trading cheap at just 7.7 times earnings, and show big upside with
minimal downside. I contend that UK banks have much more value than United States banks.
Lloyds TSB was upgraded to a “strong buy” by Standard and Poor’s, improving investor confidence and raising bids on the trading floors. LYG recently raised its dividend because of their strong free cash flow to 7.90%, this virtually guarantees profit for 2008 in my books. Competition is fierce in the UK financial services business, but there are a lot of growth opportunities. Their 12-month target was raised to $57, which is virtually a double from their current share price. Their strong free cash flow should allow them to make strong moves to drive demand, and a beta at 0.78 is irresistible. Get LYG on your 2008 wish list. Read the rest of this entry »





The play with




than 3 billion. Then I am going to look into their returns (this primarily means return on equity, assets, and capital). Returns are #1 for me because if a company can’t grow what investors are putting in, why would we give them our money? Over 10% across the board for the current year and past five years is a must. But I don’t check this on Yahoo, nope, the old forgotten 